Friday, February 20, 2015

At a hearing in the Supreme Court in 2.2.15 received the distinguished panel headed by Justice Esth


Main Areas of Practice About Posts Articles freedom of religion and freedom from religion equality in class actions and aim to discrimination and the law in Israel What is the court? Rulings and publications class action jeff banks against the "9 million" and "Direct Insurance" discrimination between jeff banks men and women in the High Court petition Insurance the right to apply to the courts and the rule of law and against Excommunication and writings of religious courts Update petition (20:11:14) Supreme Court claiming infringement of appeal against the decisions of the National Insurance and judgment Update (02/02/2015) HC 7805/00 Aloni, a councilwoman Jerusalem Municipality v municipal comptroller, PD Nez (4) 577 Knesset Elections Committee appeals against prohibited propaganda of religious parties Links Contact Us Site Map
This week, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court petition we filed a named Ness. Technology representation of the Attorney Edna most with BBQ Attorney YAFIT against the Minister of Social Affairs and the National Insurance Institute. The petition was filed against the insurance's continued refusal to establish a national assessment committees jeff banks (committees The decisions NII) for about two decades, and hide from the public jeff banks the existence of the right to appeal these committees.
Honorable Judge Esther animals in the Supreme Court decided that the respondents (Minister of Social jeff banks Affairs and National Insurance Institute) will submit their response to the petition. jeff banks NII position rejected the petition's arguments one by one and asked the court to reject it out of hand and award the petitioner high costs to express dissatisfaction on the petition jeff banks was filed. The position of Minister of Social Affairs has supported this position of the National jeff banks Insurance Institute.
A few days before the hearing respondents informed they return to their objection, assessment committees set up but they want to set only one committee (as the law states that at any branch of social security assessment committee jeff banks will be set up) and that they stand in their refusal to recognize the petitioner's right to appeal an assessment jeff banks committee.
According to the decision of the honorable Justice animals we submitted our response to the notice Respondents with expressed satisfaction with the agreement in principle jeff banks of the respondents to establish committees must, we were on our opposition jeff banks to changes they want to put in legal language and the importance of setting jeff banks schedules jeff banks are clear and of course we were on the right of the petitioner to file an appeal committee mole.
At a hearing in the Supreme Court in 2.2.15 received the distinguished panel headed by Justice Esther Animals and judges Zvi Zilbertal and Anat Baron, the petition stating that she is right and managed to change the position jeff banks of the respondents and to law enforcement. Honorable Judge animals resented 'conduct and responded firmly to his claims of attorney Amos Rosenzweig jeff banks (the attorney of the National Insurance Institute) "[FIX] jeff banks this law does not exist. jeff banks The more that the Lord will crown him the title of one kind or another, jeff banks the greater jeff banks your settings and your illegal conduct. The more that the clause older, you are still not appropriate committees have changed. You have to follow the law. You can do whatever you please. Only after this appeal you set up these committees, so why should not pay the petitioner expenses jeff banks "(line 29 on page 4 of the minutes of the discussion).
In the judgment the honorable court determines the justness of the petition and its contribution to law enforcement, set a timetable for implementing the law and the petitioner's right to appeal an assessment committee, when established. As for the issue expenses Honorable Court states jeff banks that "It jeff banks seems that there can be no dispute about the contribution of the petition process which finally announced respondents 2 and 3 for the establishment of the assessment committee. The respondents' desire to change the provisions of sections jeff banks 359 and -372 National Insurance Law [ Consolidated Version] - 1995 is legitimate and does not express an opinion but as long as these provisions indeed take place on the 2nd and 3rd respondents Cayman and can not be ignored as they Unfortunately over the years. Under these circumstances, we show that the respondents 2 and 3 shall bear the expenses petitioner and attorney's fees of $ 40,000 . "
HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title = ""> <acronym title = ""> jeff banks <b> <blockquote cite = ""> <cite> <code> <del datetime = " "> <em> <i> jeff banks <q cite =" "> <strike> <strong>
February 2015 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat November 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Recent Posts Update class action against the" 9 million "and "Direct Insurance" prohibited discrimination between men and women Revision petition against violation of the right of appeal against decisions of the National Insurance Update petition against "wrote refusal" of the religious court calling for the boycott resident of the city against the odds Elad illusions "


No comments:

Post a Comment